Clicky

Copypaste media

  1. Copypaste
  2. Advertising
  3. Tools
  4. IPTV
  5. VOD
  6. Cable TV
  7. HDTV
  8. DVB-T
  9. Music
  10. Mobile
  11. Broadcasting
  12. Blu-Ray
  13. Telco’s
  14. PVR
  15. Set-Top Boxes
  16. Digital TV Channels
  17. User Generated Content
  18. DRM
  19. P2P
  20. Marketing
  21. Consoles
  22. Internet
  23. IP owners
  24. Gaming
  25. Search
  26. Print
  27. Online Video
  28. Research
  29. Social Networks
  30. Hardware
  31. Twitter
  32. social media

Subscribe to Copypaste Media via e-mail or RSS

Research: Which brands ‘get’ social media?

2 August, 2009

Lists are always fun, but this recent study by analyst the Altimeter Group not only ranks the top 100 brands by social media engagement, but also carries some interesting finds for brands not on there – yet :)

The Most Engaged Brands On The Web study scores the engagement level of each of the top 100 brands across more than ten social media channels, including blogs, Facebook, Twitter and discussion forums.

These are companies that are open to the audience, that facilitate the conversation with their customers, that actively listen to the audience, that talk and take feedback about everything from strategic decisions to processes and product features. In short, companies that “get it”

According to the research, the top ten brands are:

1. Starbucks (127)
2. Dell (123)
3. eBay (115)
4. Google (105)
5. Microsoft (103)
6. Thomson Reuters (101)
7. Nike (100)
8. Amazon (88)
9. SAP (86)
10. Tie – Yahoo!/Intel (85)

Theory?

The definition of engagement is always a tricky thing, and handling this in a really scientific way is hard. You can always debate the methodology. Nevertheless, there is value in the findings, and the 8 page section on best practices from Starbucks, Toyota, SAP and Dell has some very concrete and practical pointers. Especially Starbucks stands out, as this Seattle-based company managed to get to the top of this list with a social media team of only 6 people. Impressive.

Maven or Wallflower?

I like the distinction between the most being “mavens,” & the least engaged being “wallflowers” (McDonalds and BP as examples). Wallflowers typically use few channels and manage them with a rather limited effort. How many social media channels brands participate in and the depth of engagement in the companies determine in which category a company ends up. Because one intern managing 10 social channels does not make an engaged company, the amount of manpower dedicated and the level of support from senior management are factored in.

Social brands make more money?

The study claims a correlation between social media engagement and revenue and profit growth. The “mavens” saw revenues grow an average of 18 percent over the past 12 months, while the Wallflowers saw revenues drop 6 percent. I think claiming that having an engaged audience will make you profitable is a pretty wild claim, and this is where the report goes overboard IMHO. I guess they were trying just a little too hard to look for a big headline. However it is clear that the strongest brands are the most engaged – which shows that for them, social media are an established part of their business today.

You can find the full 32 page report here on Docstoc.com.

Copypaste this story

Mail to a friend - Copypaste to del.icio.us

Author: Jeroen Verkroost - Category: Tools, Marketing, Internet, Research, Twitter, social media - 3,294 readers -


  1. […] This post was Twitted by marcomtop100 […]

    Pingback by Twitted by marcomtop100 — Aug 2, 2009 @ 13:44


Plaats een reactie

You must be logged in to post a comment.